Categories
Columns

Celebrity Fires Consume the Media

A mandatory evacuation remains in effect for my neighborhood in Montecito after the devastating “Tea Fire” this week. My son and I stayed at my house longer than we should have, filling the cars with keepsakes and watering the place down with a garden hose until the howling winds driving the smoke and embers our way become too much for us.

The fire was churning on all the hills behind my house in wide, glowing swaths — not like the usual thin line of flame we’re used to seeing at the leading edge of a fire. Being in the path of the fire, the wind blew the smoke, soot and embers directly at us making it difficult to see more than a few feet at times, and sometimes clearing to reveal a brightening, eerie, orange glow as the fire drew closer. I was sure the fire was only a couple of houses away when we fled. Firemen were directing traffic and calling on people to evacuate; I didn’t see them doing any fire fighting when we left. The fire was moving too fast for fire fighting and all they could do was focus on people.

I found my way past police barricades the next morning to see that my house survived, along with all the houses on my street. I live adjacent to Westmont College, which lost a half dozen buildings, and the next street over from mine, Westmont Road, lost a number of homes. The hills all around are barren and charred. The last report I saw estimated 150 homes lost.

I know how my neighbors feel. I was a college student, living with my mother in the same spot, when the 1977 Sycamore Canyon fire destroyed our home and about 250 others. Both fires started in the exact, same location and burned much the same area.

I also get a sense of deja vu from the media coverage of the fire. Reports from around the world have focused on celebrities who live in town. The news leads with quotes from Oprah Winfrey (her house is fine; she was out of town at the time) and actor Rob Lowe (whose house was undamaged). We see lists of celebrities with recognizable names who live in town. Actor Christopher Lloyd was out of town as his caretaker fled his house, which was “valued last year at $11.3 million.” Crazy prices of local mansions are listed. We read about how many acres there are on Oprah’s estate. Readers love stories about rich, beautiful, powerful celebrities who are made to suffer. Schadenfreude sells. Supermarket tabloids delight us with one celebrity hardship after another.

American celebrity suffering is even more titillating to audiences around the world. I was in London some years ago when there was a fire in Malibu, and I witnessed firsthand the delight screaming from tabloid headlines. I remember watching the puppet show, “Spitting Image,” the number-one show on British TV at the time; the audience roared in laughter as puppet caricatures of celebrities ran this way and that, chased by fire. A screaming, flaming Sylvester Stallone puppet yelled, “Yo! Yo! Yo!”

The media’s celebrity obsession has little to do with actual events on the ground. Most of the homes that were lost belong to regular folks. I inherited my house from my mother who spent her career working for the local school district. The homes of 14 teachers at Westmont College were lost. I don’t know where those celebrities live.

In 1977 the media’s trivial obsessions had a tangible effect. President Jimmy Carter refused to declare a federal disaster area, noting that the people here are wealthy and can take care of themselves. A disaster declaration would have meant that my mother and I could have lived in a FEMA trailer for a year, while our house was being re-built.

A few months later there was a similar fire in Malibu; for some reason, the media didn’t focus on celebrities that time and Carter declared a disaster area, even though the average income of the Malibu fire victims was higher than the income of victims of my fire. Media coverage made the difference.

President Carter’s smarmy, hypocritical response turned me into a Republican.

Daryl Cagle is a political cartoonist and blogger for MSNBC.com; he is a past president of the National Cartoonists Society and his cartoons are syndicated to more than 850 newspapers, including the paper you are reading. Daryl runs the most popular cartoon site on the Web at Cagle.msnbc.com. His book “The BIG Book of Campaign 2008 Political Cartoons,” is available in bookstores now, and he has a new book coming out before Christmas, “The Best Political Cartoons of the Year, 2009 Edition.” See Daryl’s cartoons and columns at www.caglepost.com.

Categories
Columns

See Me at the University of Virginia

I’ll give a speech, show a lot of cartoons
and answer questions at the University of Virginia on October
22nd in Charlottesville, Virginia. It is a rare opportunity to
see me, since I’m such a recluse. Here is what the University
has announced …

The daily editorial cartoonist for MSNBC.com,
Daryl Cagle, will discuss with words and artwork the sometimes
seemingly irreverent and provocative role of editorial cartoonists
in capturing and dissecting issues and events in politics. Mr.
Cagle’s recently published Big Book of Campaign 2008 Cartoons
will be available for sale at the event and he will sign books
following his presentation. The event is free and open to the
public, but advance registration
is required.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Drawing Politics
is part of the University of Virginia Center for Politics National
Symposium Series of 2008, titled Not Taboo at Our Table! Race,
Religion and Gender in American Politics
. The Center for
Politics launched the National Symposium Series in 1999 to explore
current and relevant issues in American politics. For questions,
contact Megan Davis at [email protected]
or 434-243-3539.

This event is co-sponsored by the University
of Virginia Center for Politics

and the University
of Virginia Miller Center of Public Affairs
.

Categories
Columns

Our New Campaign Book is in Stores Now!

Our big collection
of cartoons covering the presidential campaign is out in bookstores
a month before election day!

We’ve got the best of the campaign from
start to almost-finish, with Obama, McCain, Sarah Palin, the
convention, Hillary Clinton and all those wonderful memories,
like 3:00am phone calls, super-delegates and crazy preachers!
We even have a chapter on John Edwards’ affair!

This book is a must have for every political
wonk! And you must have it now, while we’re still obsessed with
the campaign!



Click here to order The BIG Book of Campaign
2008 Political Cartoons, from Amazon.com at a nice discount

I have to thank our editor, Laura Norman,
at Que Publishing, division of Pearson, for being so fast getting
the book published and shipped to stores. We closed the book
after we had a whole lot of cartoons for a chapter on Sarah Pain
and her pregnant daughter, and we have the book in stores a month
later, which is amazing for book distribution. Still, everyone
is better off ordering from Amazon.com, where it is cheaper.
You can even search inside the book on Amazon.com, which is pretty
cool.

Right now we’re busy working on our regular,
annual Best Political Cartoons of the Year book, which is due
at the printer on the day after election day, and should be in
stores the first week of December. These deadlines are why I’m
not drawing as many cartoons as I should be right now. Sorry
about that.

Categories
Columns

Two of our Favorite Cartoonists Retire









I’m sorry to
write that two of my favorite political cartoonists have retired
from our tiny profession.



Sandy Huffaker is one my cartoon heroes.
When I was in college I was a big fan of his cartoons that were
running every week in Time Magazine. Sandy worked as a regular
editorial cartoonist for a newspaper when he was young, then
spent his career as a cartoon illustrator. Now he spends
most of his time at his ranch in Virginia doing paintings. He
had been drawing editorial cartoons regularly for our syndicate
for the past few years.

Sandy called me a couple of months ago
to say he was tired of the daily editorial cartooning grind.
He is an Obama supporter, he thinks Obama will win and prospect
of losing President Bush makes him lose his anger and passion.
I encouraged Sandy to draw whenever the inspiration hits him,
and last week he sent us this portrait of McCain and baby Palin
(right).

If any of our readers are Huffaker fans,
as I am, and are sorry to see him go, send
Sandy an e-mail
and tell him he is missed!

The other cartoonist we’re losing is M.e. Cohen, a freelancer with a wild style
from New Jersey. M.e. is retiring from editorial cartooning because
of a detached retina. He plans to keep doing illustrations, but the daily, freelance political
cartoons were just too much. I’m also hopeful that M.e. will
come back; it is tragic to see him leave us.

See more cartoons by M.e.
here
. That is one of his samples
below. Click here to send
M.e. an e-mail
and let him know he is also missed.

Categories
Columns

I’m asking for your help

I’d like to ask our readers to help our
cartoonists with an urgent problem. We are asking you to send an email on behalf
of the cartoonists
. The Senate just passed the "Orphan
Works Bill," quickly, behind closed doors and without a
vote, through a controversial practice known as "hotlining."
The bill rewrites the copyright law in ways that are devastating
to cartoonists, artists, writers, photographers and songwriters.

The two artists organizations I’m active
in, the
National Cartoonists Society
and the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists, and dozens
of other trade organizations
, are
urging their members to write to their congressmen at this hour,
because there is a risk that the House will pass the Senate version
of the bill, again without debate and without a vote, by adding
it to a larger budget or bailout bill at the end of the current
session, in the next few hours.

The Orphan Works bill is being pushed by
Google, which plans to catalogue millions of images and doesn’t
want to deal with the rights of copyright holders. The bill
will make it easy for anyone to reprint copyrighted work, without
the permission of the copyright holder, and artists will find
that it is difficult or impossible to control where their work
is reprinted. The bill also imposes new costs and procedures
on artists, all to benefit Google.

I’d like to ask everyone who reads my blog,
or subscribes to my newsletter, to do the cartoonists a favor
by emailing their congressman and asking him or her to oppose
the Orphan Works Bill now, by visiting this web site, which helps you to
send an automatic email to your congressman. It is quick and
easy to send this email, and it would be much appreciated by
the desperate cartoonists.

To learn more about the Orphan Works Bill,
visit here.

I’ve never asked my readers for help before.
I’d really appreciate your help now.

Many thanks,

Daryl

Categories
Columns

The Future of Editorial Cartoons

One of our good foreign customers wrote to me, and to a batch of top international cartoonists asking them what they thought the future of editorial cartooning would be. Here is my response:

I disagree with most of my cartoonist colleagues on this – most cartoonists view the future creatively, arguing that there will be more animation in cartoons and more cartoons created to take advantage of the interactivity of the internet. I disagree, because I also run a syndicate and I see no trend for web customers to be willing to pay for interactive or animated cartoons. This is just cartoonists describing what they hope will happen.

The big change I see happening is the decline of big newspapers, and an increase in small clients, free weekly newspapers and non-traditional clients who would not buy cartoons before, because the process was too difficult or expensive. As the big publishers die off and cut back, we pick up new small web sites, newsletters, weeklies and foreign publications, which wouldn’t have found us before, if not for the internet.

The future is not a change in the nature of cartoons, which remain popular in their current, static form, it is a change in distribution of cartoons to more clients, smaller clients, and more obscure clients in more faraway places, as publications become smaller and more numerous, as more people become easier to reach and as more people around the world have interests in the same issues.

Categories
Columns

Cagle FAQ

We get the same questions in the email
box every day and I thought I would take some time out to respond
to some of the most frequent ones.

You say you update the cartoons "every
day" but I see lots of the same cartoons are up now that
were there yesterday. What’s up with that?

The fact that we update the cartoons everyday
doesn’t mean that each cartoonist draws a new cartoon every day.
Most editorial cartoonists draw between three and five cartoons
per week, some draw once a week. Some draw six times a week.
Some draw local cartoons some days, that they don’t send to us.
Some take vacations. On the busiest days of the week we update
the site with 100 new cartoons per day ­ there are 175 cartoonist
slots on the site.

Why can’t you set up your site so that
I don’t have to look at those same cartoons that I saw yesterday?
I want to see only the new cartoons.

Look at our RSS feeds which feature only
the newly updated cartoons at the top of each page.

Where are your RSS feeds?

Go to our daily updating cartoons pages and click on
the orange button to the left of any cartoonist’s name, or scroll
to the bottom to click on the RSS feeds for batches of artists.
We can’t include all of the cartoons in one RSS feed because
the pages are too long with 100 new cartoons on busy days.

Why don’t you make the cartoons in your
RSS feeds full sized? I have to click on each cartoon to be able
to read it.

That’s so that you have to look at an ad
and we don’t go broke.

I have a great idea for a cartoon! Want
to hear it?

No.

I have lots of great ideas for cartoons,
but I can’t draw. Can you tell me which editorial cartoonist
I should contact to draw my cartoons?

I don’t know any editorial cartoonists
who work with gag writers.

I would like to have a cartoon logo
drawn for my business and I like your style. Could you do that
for me? I can’t afford to pay any more than $50.

No.

I have to write a paper about an editorial
cartoon and I picked yours. Can you tell me what it means? Please
tell me right away because my paper is due tomorrow.

Sorry, I get too many requests like this.
I have to let the cartoons speak for themselves. Besides, you’re
supposed to be following the news and the meaning of the cartoon
should be obvious to you ­ if it is not, then it wasn’t a
good cartoon.

Would you like to: Enlarge your penis?
Get cheap drugs? Refinance? Help us move millions of dollars
from a foreign dignitary’s bank account?

No. No. No. No.

May I run your cartoon in my blog?

If you are on Myspace.com, yes, go to any
cartoon on
caglepost.com’s cartoon ticker
page
, click on the thumbnail image
for any cartoon, then click on the Myspace.com link to put the
cartoon on Myspace.com. If you are not on Myspace.com, you can post
any of our caglecartoons.com cartoons on your blog for a nominal
fee, just visit Politicalcartoons.com. We may do a Facebook application
in the future.

May I use your cartoon for my class
at school?

Yes. In fact, "in-classroom"
use is one of the "Fair Use" exceptions to the copyright
law. You can use any copyrighted materials you want in the classroom
without asking.

May I post your cartoon on my high school
class web site? Or in my school newspaper? Or on posters at school?

No, unless you want to pay the nominal
fee on politicalcartoons.com ($3 for school use). These school
uses are not "in-classroom."

Why don’t you let us use your cartoons
for free in schools?

We tried that, but we found that letting
people download free, high-resolution cartoons on Politicalcartoons.com
was a bandwidth hole. Suddenly everybody was saying they wanted
cartoons for schools and our bandwidth went through the roof.
When we put a $3 fee up for schools the bandwidth bleeding stopped.

I have to write a paper on the career
I want to go into and I chose cartooning. Please tell me:

1) How much money do you make?

2) How much education was required for you to get your job?

3) How much time does it take you to draw a cartoon?

4) How did you get into this business?

1) Cartoonists make anything between $0
per year and $50,000,000 per year ­ just like actors, musicians
and basketball players. And, like actors, musicians and basketball
players, most cartoonists make closer to $0 than $50,000,000.

2) No education is required, only quality
of work and some business acumen ­ but that is true of most
careers. Education is very important and it is unusual for anyone
to be successful without a good education.

3) All my life. Some cartoonists brag about
drawing quickly; I think this diminishes the value of their work
in the eyes of their editors and readers. Good cartoonists think
about their work all the time and spend a lit of time working
to improve.

4) I started as a general illustrator,
and then worked as a cartoon illustrator, then I worked as a
toy inventor, I did a syndicated cartoon, then editorial cartoons.
I drew other people’s characters in other people’s styles, working
on projects for others before my career got to the point that
I could draw as I wanted.

Why don’t you have any conservative
cartoonists on your site?

We have a lot, but conservatives, like
you conservatives notice the cartoons you disagree with more
than the others. It is an optical illusion for you.

When are you going to stop bashing President
Bush?

Be patient. It won’t be long.

I can’t cancel my newsletter subscription!
What do I do to make it stop?

Most people who can’t cancel are replying
to the email with a note asking to cancel ­ we don’t get
these replies. To cancel you have to click on the unsubscribe
link in the newsletter, or go to our newsletter subscriptions page and follow
the instructions. Another problem is with people who have the
newsletter forwarded from another email address ­ there is
no way for us to know that, and clicking on the unsubscribe link
won’t make any change to a different email address. If you are
flummoxed, email us.

I tried to subscribe to your newsletters,
but I don’t get anything! What’s wrong?

You probably have an email account with
a company like Earthlink, which does "whitelisting"
­ that is, these providers send an email reply to us, asking
us to confirm that we are a real person who wants to send an
email. This is a method of preventing spam. We don’t respond
to the "whitelisting" replies. Your only solution is
to try subscribing from another free email service, like Yahoo,
Google or Hotmail, which doesn’t do "whitelisting."

You might have a spam filter – take a look
at your blocked emails and approve us as a sender.

I was getting your newsletters, but
they suddenly stopped. What’s wrong?

If we get the email bounced back from your
email address a couple of times, your subscription is automatically
cancelled. You may have had technical problems with your email,
or you may have had a full mailbox. You need to go to our newsletter subscription
page
and resubscribe.

Another problem is spam filters. You might
have a new spam filter, or a new setting on your spam filter
– take a look at your blocked emails and approve us as a sender.

I was getting your newsletters fine
for a while, and now I don’t see the images in the newsletter
­ they are all broken image links? What’s wrong?

Some email services, like Hotmail, will
occasionally ask you to approve images from senders and will
block the images in an email from displaying until you approve
the images from us, or any other sender. This is to prevent users
from accidentally seeing pornography in a spam email. Just approve
us for image display in your email program.

I want you to syndicate my cartoons.
Will you look at my samples?

No, sorry. We get too many requests from
aspiring cartoonists and just don’t have the resources to deal
with unsolicited submissions. Also, we have had bad experiences
with angry amateur cartoonists who won’t take "no"
for an answer and now we are skittish.

Your site is slow!

No it’s not! The problem is on your end,
or in between you and our server ­ Microsoft serves the Cagle.MSNBC.com
site ­ it is like getting electricity from the utility. We
can blast as much bandwidth as all of MSNBC.com. Our cartoons
are bandwidth heavy compared to other sites that are mostly text,
so our pages will naturally take longer to load.

But, if you’re complaining about Polticalcartoons.com
or Caglepost.com, we serve those sites outside of MSNBC.com,
and yes, sometimes we have too much traffic. We’re upgrading
from two servers to four and we should be speedy all the time
with our new load balancing. We’re working on it and we apologize
for any hassles.

Categories
Columns

How I Draw My Cartoons – Roughs and Finishes

I get occasional requests from readers to explain the nuts and bolts of how I draw my cartoons, and to show my rough sketches. Here are three examples.

First I do a rough sketch in hard pencil on 11" by 17" paper. I like the extra hard pencils because they encourge me not to spend too much time on the rough – the hard pencil keeps me from rendering, which I tend to want to do. If I don’t like how a sketch is going, I’ll throw it out and start a new one, rather than trying to repair the sketch. These are pretty fast.

Then I draw the finished line art by tracing over the rough. I use Duralene paper, which is a plastic drafting vellum that has a way of gripping the pencil that I find pleasing. I do my finished line art with either a hard #5 pencil if I’m feeling too loose, or a yellow #2 office pencil if I’m feeling too stiff.

Most newspapers run the black and white artwork. I usually don’t like the look of tone in my cartoons, so I’ll do cross hatching and blacks to give the lines some substance on the page. This drawing is the same 11" by 17" size.

Here’s another rough. It is the same thing, hard pencil on tabloid size paper.

Then I trace it in pencil on drafting vellum, adding cross hatching tones and blacks.

And I’ll usually color the cartoon in Photoshop, depending on how much time I have. Only a few newspapers run color on their Op-Ed pages, but color is nice on the web site.

Here’s another one. I’m including this one because the rough is a little messier.

This one is about as complex as I like to get in a cartoon. I think cartoons are stronger with only one or two big characters filling the space. Cartoons are better with fewer words too, and this cartoon is a little weak, but it made a point that I haven’t seen made in other cartoons so I went with it. Here it is below, in pencil on the drafting vellum, with some hatching for tone to give it some substance on the page, as most readers will see it.

And here it is with some quick Photoshop color.

I usually try to use light, pastel colors, because that is what editors ask for. The light pastels look best in lousy newspaper printing where colors tend to muddy up and darken. Earth tones are always a gamble in newspapers; there is no way of knowing if a brown will lean to red or to blue. Unfortunately, the light, pastel, compromise newspaper colors tend to look a bit unsophiscated on the web – I regret that, but I don’t have a good solution for it.

Categories
Columns

Zapiro Rape Cartoon Controversy

My buddy, Jonathan "Zapiro" Shapiro is having
a bit of a cartoon controversy down in South Africa with the
Zuma rape cartoon (right). Here are some excerpts from a Los Angeles Times article about the cartoon:


The cartoon shows Zuma preparing to rape
the justice system, portrayed as a blindfolded woman pinned down
by his political allies in the ANC, the Communist Party, unions
and the ANC Youth League.


Published in the Sunday Times of Johannesburg,
the cartoon lampoons a campaign by Zuma’s supporters to throw
out charges of corruption, fraud and racketeering that he faces
so he can seek South Africa’s presidency. In a country with one
of the world’s highest rates of rape — and one deeply divided
between supporters and opponents of Zuma, who was acquitted of
rape charges in 2006 — the drawing has been explosive.


The nation’s high court is due to rule
today on Zuma’s bid to have the charges against him dismissed




As he has done since the 2006 rape trial, Zapiro drew Zuma as
having a shower sprouting from his head — a reference to the
party leader’s testimony that to avoid AIDS he showered after
having unprotected sex with an HIV-positive woman. Zuma has thrice
sued the cartoonist for libel. Two suits were withdrawn; the
third is pending.

Quotes from Jonathan:


The central message is that Jacob Zuma
is about to violate and rape the justice system with the help
of his political allies. Justice is an allegorical figure but
she does have a certain amount of humanity in the way I’ve drawn
her, which added to the shock value. It’s [Zuma’s] own rape trial,
for which he was acquitted, that makes it more explosive.


It wasn’t my being worried about Zuma’s
rape trial that made me think twice, three times, four times,
five times before doing this drawing. It was women’s feelings
I was more worried about. I sent the cartoon around to some very
trusted female friends. The initial shock at seeing the drawing
almost made people draw breath. You gasp when you see it. But
within a brief amount of time they considered the drawing and
said it’s valid both in terms of what it’s saying about Zuma’s
violation of our justice system and our constitutional tenets
but also in terms of the very violent and patriarchal society
that we have …



There were plenty of people who were offended by it, but what
I found fascinating is that on some of the talk shows where I
have taken some flak, the proportion of flak-givers is much higher
from men than women. There was one call that came from a gang-rape
victim, who said that she was shocked by it and felt very uncomfortable,
but then she proceeded to support it.

Categories
Columns

Why are there so few women who are political cartoonists?

I’m constantly being asked why there are
so few women that are editorial cartoonists. I don’t have a good
answer for that. One of the few female cartoonists on our site,
altie cartoonist Jen Sorensen, wrote an excellent column on
the topic for Campus
Progress
and has graciously allowed us to reprint it here.

Wanted: Female Cartoonist

By Jen Sorensen




Why are there so few female political cartoonists? I’ve been
asked that question many times over the years. It’s OK, I don’t
mind. We’re something of a rare breed. Exact statistics are difficult
to find-even the national group Association of American Editorial
Cartoonists can only estimate the national number of political
cartoonists, let alone break them down by gender, ethnicity,
or class. But to give you a rough idea, of the association’s
185 current regular members, only 15 are women. I’m one of them.



My short (and admittedly Zen-like) explanation is that there
are so few female political cartoonists largely because there
are so few female political cartoonists. Drawing cartoons and
comics has traditionally been a guy thing-a somewhat nerdy guy
thing, but a guy thing nonetheless. Without role models who look
like you, or friends with similar interests, any activity becomes
less inviting. It might not even cross your mind as a possibility.



But when did political cartooning first become the province of
dudes? Patriot dude Ben Franklin is widely credited with the
first American political cartoon: The famous "Join or Die" drawing of
the chopped-up snake representing the 13 original colonies
.
In the 1870s, a dude named Thomas Nast became the first major
editorial page cartoonist, followed by 20th-century dudely doodlers
such as Bill Mauldin and Herbert "Herblock" Block.
In 1915, Edwina Dumm became the first American non-dude
to work full-time as an editorial cartoonist
, a remarkable
feat considering women didn’t win the right to vote until 1920.
Given that women were deemed irrational, not expected to hold
intellectual jobs, and certainly not supposed to have political
opinions, the skewed demographics of the profession don’t seem
all that mysterious.



A more contemporary problem comes in the form of profitable and
supposedly progressive web publications like The Huffington Post
that make it a policy not to pay for content. This business model
presumes contributors have other sources of income; paying in
"exposure" instead. If this setup becomes the industry
standard, those without ample resources, especially women and
minorities, will simply not be able to afford to survive as political
cartoonists.



The challenges faced by female cartoonists parallel those of
female op-ed writers. Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus recently
suggested
that the dearth of female op-ed writers in newspapers
is largely due to the imposition of "our own glass ceiling"
as opposed to editors’ sexism. Women need to show more chutzpah,
she argues. We must close the "cockiness gap" between
ourselves and the great hordes of brashly bloviating males.



As
Katha Pollitt has rightly noted
, however, there’s an abundance
of highly qualified and willing female writers whose numbers
are not reflected on the commentary pages of major newspapers.
The op-ed pages of the Post feature two women and 23 men, despite
the fact that plenty of women write about politics and current
events.



Clearly, forces beyond "our own glass ceilings" are
at work. In the case of political cartoonists, however, there
aren’t quite so many women waiting in the wings.



This is not to cut Marcus any slack. Her argument fails to address
the often subtle ways in which gender inequality works. If there
is a cockiness gap, it might have something to do with ye olde
double standard that ambitious women are perceived as you-know-whats.
To be fair, Marcus does facetiously refer to "a certain
unbecoming arrogance" required of outspoken women, but she
paradoxically blames women for not displaying it.



Media coverage of cartoonists works the same way. The Columbia Journalism Review recently interviewed
political cartoonists and editors
about their opinion of
the controversial New Yorker cover; they spoke with nine men
and zero women.



So how did I buck the trend? It’s hard to say. I do know I recognized
the unfairness of gender roles from a very early age, even though
nobody slipped a copy of The Feminine Mystique into my playpen.
My parents did indulge my tomboyish tendencies, though, buying
me reams of comics and copies of MAD Magazine. As teachers, they
also valued education and creativity, and were fully supportive
of my round-the-clock cartooning habit. There wasn’t much else
to do where we lived; as far as I was concerned, drawing comics
was how I entertained myself.



While in college in the mid-1990s, I was invited to submit to
an all-female comic anthology called Action Girl. This was my
professional debut. Thanks in part to Action Girl, I was motivated
to publish my own comic book after graduating. The result: Slowpoke
Comix #1, a collection of short stories that were precursors
to my weekly strip. One marked the debut of my character Drooly
Julie, a randy femme with a penchant for stubbly metalheads.
It was only after the 2000 election that my work took a sharp
political turn, as did that of many other cartoonists. As I crossed
this threshold, I wasn’t thinking much about breaking gender
barriers. I was just freaked out by the country’s sudden takeover
by wackadoos.



Over the years, my work appeared in more and more places, often
alternative newsweeklies. These papers tended to be more progressive-minded
than mainstream media, and I never got the sense that I was going
up against a wall of chauvinism. I do get the sense, however,
that some progressive publications don’t try as hard as they
could to diversify their mastheads. As Women In Media and News founder Jennifer Pozner
puts it, one of the biggest obstacles appears to be time
:
It can take longer and require more effort to look beyond the
familiar or entrenched stables of male cartoonists and editorial
writers.



Despite these occasional frustrations, the past decade suggests
that the situation is improving. If my favorite comic convention,
the Small Press Expo in Maryland, is any indication, there are
more women than ever on both sides of the exhibitor tables. To
invoke the flip side of my Zen koan: The more female cartoonists
there are, the more there will be.



Jen Sorensen draws Slowpoke Comics. She recently
released
Slowpoke: One Nation, Oh My God! It is great! Click here
to buy it. C’mon.