Categories
Blog

Cartoonist Talks About Controversial Chick-fil-A Cartoon

We’ve received a lot of great cartoons about Chick-fil-A from both sides of the argument. Some cartoonists supported the First Amendment rights of a CEO voicing his own personal opinion, while other cartoonists thought spending corporate profits on anti-gay causes was bigotry that deserved to be called out.

The largest response came in reaction to this tough cartoon by Jimmy Margulies of The Record:

I asked Jimmy to comment on the cartoon, and here’s what he wrote:

I received both praise and condemnation for this cartoon. Those who agreed with me seemed to really like it. Those who did not expressed their disagreement in a few different ways. Some took the cartoon literally, suggesting I was saying that Chick-fil-A discriminates against its gay customers. I explained the cartoon was an exaggeration. Others felt that I was supporting the boycott of the restaurant and that I was denying the owner his freedom of speech. I explained that the cartoon took no position on the boycott, and that the owner is free to express his views, as well as give money to fund opposition to same sex marriage, but that I found this position objectionable, so I was using my cartoon to speak out about the injustice on the issue of same sex marriage.

Given the potency of the issue, I was glad my cartoon became part of the debate.

As you can imagine, readers on both sides of the argument weighed in on this polarizing cartoon:

Edward Bartunek: Disguesting and a insult to honest, god fearing, hardworking, Americans!

Teri Lesesne: I elect to boycott companies that spew inaccurate information and use their “fame” as a platform for hate. You are free to support them. That is what freedom is all about. But freedom has to be for everyone.

Kerry Wilson Cook: It doesn’t matter. Us gay people don’t go to chickfila anyway. We are all too health conscious to eat the slop that is fast food!!

Jamie Lockett: I wonder how political cartoonists would feel about mayors banning newspapers that carry their cartoons simply because those mayors didn’t like the content.

Robot Anna: Let’s please not appropriate the civil rights movement, thanks.

Jordan Fouts: I like how the same people who suck the invisible thumb of the free market get so mad about boycotts.

Joyce Linnae Crady: I hate boycotts. They hurt innocent workers & the economy. I vote for religious freedom and freedom of speech. As long as Chick-fil-A doesn’t discriminate in their establishments, they have a constitutional right to their beliefs and a right to express them.

Sunny Arts: This comic is an affront to the efforts of the civil rights movement – when segregation was truly being preached and enforced. Nobody is shoving gays to the ‘back of the bus’.

Steve Paysen: Have you seen the support of Chic Fil A today? I’d say you first of all are wrong in your portrayal, and who are you to take away the right of any man to answer a question with his conscience?

Terry Lee: Talk about rhetoric. Let’s be clear. People aren’t upset or up in arms about a man’s opinion or religious belief. People are boycotting this business because the BUSINESS donates large sums of money to anti-gay political/hate groups. He is free to express his opinion, certainly. I also am free to take my money elsewhere and encourage others to do the same.

What’s your opinion of the cartoon? Comment below, or drop us a note on our Facebook page.

By Daryl Cagle

Daryl Cagle is the founder and owner of Cagle Cartoons, Inc. He is one of the most widely published editorial cartoonists and is also the editor of The Cagle Post.

3 replies on “Cartoonist Talks About Controversial Chick-fil-A Cartoon”

I love how certain people try to take away the validity of the discrimination that LGBTQ people face, saying that it's "Not the same" as their much more pious and valid struggle for equality- all just so they can blindly discriminate against us with no sense of irony. Egregious and disgusting. But hey! You got yours, right??

Dear Mr. Margulies, I was instantly offended (and disappointed!) in your cartoon which quite obviously states YOUR opinion of people expressing THEIR First Amendment right (what little we have left, that is!) regardless of the topic! From what I read of Mr. Cathy's statement, he simply AGREED with God's original purpose and intention of putting ONE MALE and ONE FEMALE together in a physical commitment for the purpose of procreation. Mr. Cathy did NOT say "he's against gay people" but your cartoon has insinuated very graphically that Mr. Cathy considers the LGBTQ people as "lesser" or "second-class" or maybe "not good enough" to be served at Chick-fil-A the same as straight people. From my perspective Mr. Margulies, your inappropriate cartoon has deliberately opened the ugly door of bigotry and segregation AGAIN! and WIDER!

"Your inappropriate cartoon has deliberately opened the ugly door of bigotry and segregation AGAIN!" How?
"Your cartoon has insinuated very graphically that Mr. Cathy considers the LGBTQ people as "lesser" or "second-class" or maybe "not good enough" to be served at Chick-fil-A the same as straight people. " So does your assumption that "God's original purpose and intention of putting ONE MALE and ONE FEMALE together in a physical commitment for the purpose of procreation." This is your belief, and you are welcome to it. In case you haven't noticed, though, God apparently intended that people should not eat shellfish or cheeseburgers or pork because these are all listed as being "abominations." Somewhere along the lines the rules changed, or people like Mr. Cathy decided they could start cherry picking which rules they would decide to obey.

Comments are closed.